Breadwinning Moms, Caregiving Dads: Double Standard in Social Judgments of Gender Norm Violators
نویسنده
چکیده
This study explores the role of gender ideologies in moderating social judgments of gender norm violators. Three hundred and eleven participants evaluated a male or a female target who was either a primary breadwinner or a primary caregiver. Attributions of personal traits, moral emotions, and marital emotions were examined. Results showed that both traditional and egalitarian individuals applied a double standard when judging deviations from gendered family roles. However, and as predicted, traditional individuals evaluated the normative targets more favorably than the norm-violating targets, whereas egalitarians evaluated the norm-violating targets more favorably. These findings shed light on the important moderating role of gender ideologies and help account for the inconsistencies in previous findings regarding social judgments of gender norm violators.
منابع مشابه
www.econstor.eu Norm enforcement in the city: A natural field experiment
Extensive evidence from laboratory experiments indicates that many individuals are willing to use costly punishment to enforce social norms, even in one-shot interactions. However, there appears to be little evidence in the literature of such behavior in the field. We study the propensity to punish norm violators in a natural field experiment conducted in the main subway station in Athens, Gree...
متن کاملREVERSAL OF THE BLACK SHEEP EFFECT 1 Running head: REVERSAL OF THE BLACK SHEEP EFFECT Not as black as one of 'them': Positive ingroup valence reverses the Black Sheep Effect
Judgments about individual group members are often colored by judgments about the entire group. Through such an assimilation effect, an individual norm violator from a positively evaluated group, for example an ingroup, can be expected to be evaluated less negatively than an outgroup norm violator. This hypothesis however contrasts with evidence that ingroup norm violators are often derogated c...
متن کاملIndividual Differences in Activation of the Parental Care Motivational System: An Empirical Distinction Between Protection and Nurturance
Previous research reveals that individual differences in parental caregiving motives have implications (among both parents and nonparents) for a wide range of psychological outcomes. Here we report reanalyses of existing data sets to examine the extent to which these outcomes are uniquely predicted by two conceptually distinct factors underlying the parental caregiving motive: protection and nu...
متن کاملAnimal behaviour Defectors , not norm violators , are punished by third - parties
Punishment of defectors and cooperators is prevalent when their behaviour deviates from the social norm. Why atypical behaviour is more likely to be punished than typical behaviour remains unclear. One possible proximate explanation is that individuals simply dislike norm violators. However, an alternative possibility exists: individuals may be more likely to punish atypical behaviour, because ...
متن کاملMoms at Work and Dads at Home: Children’s Evaluations of Parental Roles
Children’s evaluations of two parental roles, working outside the home, and staying home to take care of children, were assessed in second (M1⁄4 7.13 years, SD1⁄4 .39) and fifth grade (M1⁄4 10.42, SD1⁄4 .57) students (N1⁄4 121). Children viewed it as acceptable for both mothers and fathers to work full-time, and used personal choice and social conventional reasons as justifications. In contrast...
متن کامل